In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4.. … v. M/S.firmenich Aromatics India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: SANKLECHA, J.DATE : 2 July 2013 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we condone the delay of 77 days and allow the Notice of Motion in terms of prayer clause (a).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.368 OF 2013
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.320 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4.. …......Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Firmenich Aromatics India Pvt. Ltd.....Respondents
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Revenue.
Mr. Jain with Mr. B.G. Yewale i/b. Rajesh Shah & Co., for the respondent.
P.C.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.DATE : 2 July 2013
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we condone the delay of 77 days and allow the Notice of Motion in terms of prayer clause (a).
CHIEF JUSTICE
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue