The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S.harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd
High Court
01 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S.harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S.harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4...Appellant
vs.
M/s.Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd....Respondent.
---
Mr.Vimal Gupta, for appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta, for Respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 1[st] August, 2008.
P.C.:-1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for boththe sides. Perused the record. It is clear from therecord that when the revised computation was filedduring the assessment proceedings, the assessee wasnot told that the revised computation cannot beconsidered in the absence of revised return and that
caused prejudice to the assessee. Therefore, thetribunal is right in directing the assessing officerto entertain the claim of deduction made by theAssessee. We do not see that any question of lawarises. Hence, the appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.