The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S.j.m. Morgan Stanley Retail Servicesprivate Ltd
High Court
18 Jan 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S.j.m. Morgan Stanley Retail Servicesprivate Ltd
Date of order
18 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S.j.m. Morgan Stanley Retail Servicesprivate Ltd, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the circumstances, the appeal is allowed and the question of law is answered in terms of the judgment of Techno Shares (supra).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3188 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4.
...Appellant.
Vs.
M/s.J.M. Morgan Stanley Retail ServicesPrivate Ltd....Respondent.
....
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.Mr.Sujeeth S.Karkal i/b. Mr.Ajay R. Singh for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
January 18, 2010.
P.C. :
The appeal was admitted on the following substantial
question of law:
“ Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation u/s.32 of the Income Tax Act is allowable on the membership card of the Stock Exchange?”
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant and
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Assessee state that the question
of law is covered, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee, by the judgment of the Division Bench in CIT vs. Techno
Shares & Stock Ltd., 225 CTR 337. In the circumstances, the
appeal is allowed and the question of law is answered in terms of the judgment of Techno Shares (supra). There shall be no order as to costs.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.