The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S.uti Securities Ltd

srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.787 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4 ...Appellant Versus M/s.UTI Securities Ltd. ...Respondent Ms.P.S.Cardozo for appellant. Mr. Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Atul Jasani for respondent. CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. February 28, 2012. P.C. Not on board. Appeal has been called out on Board by consent of the counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and the counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee and has been been taken up having regard to the fact that the issue is covered by the judgment delivered today in a batch of appeals. The counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that the question of law which has been raised by the Revenue would stand covered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee by the judgment delivered today i.e. 28/2/2012 in companion Income Tax Appeal No.89 of 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai Vs. Shreyas S. Morakhia. In the circumstances, no substantial question of law would arise. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)