Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Shri...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Shri Mukul S. Kasliwal

High Court 23 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Shri Mukul S. Kasliwal
Date of order
23 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Shri Mukul S. Kasliwal, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1954 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.782 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4..Appellant Vs. Shri Mukul S. Kasliwal ..Respondent Mrs. P.P. Bhosale with Mr. B.M. Chatterjee for the Appellant. None for the Respondent CORAM: F.I. A.A.SAYED DATED: 23RD JULY,2007 . We find that the papers were sent to the Ministry of law on 10th November, 2003. The The draft appeal memo was received on 29th January, 2004 and the Appeal was filed on 1st July, 2004. There is no explanation between 29th January, 2004 and 1st July, 2004. The last date for filing the Appeal was 5th November, 2003. Considering the above, in our opinion, the same does not amount to sufficient cause and consequently Motion dismissed. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan