The Commissioner Of Income Tax 5, Mumbai 400 020 v. M/S Mahameru Trading Co.pvt.ltd
High Court
07 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax 5, Mumbai 400 020 v. M/S Mahameru Trading Co.pvt.ltd
Date of order
07 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax 5, Mumbai 400 020 v. M/S Mahameru Trading Co.pvt.ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, The Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2395 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax 5, Mumbai 400 020
v/s
M/s Mahameru Trading Co.Pvt.Ltd.,
Mumbai 400 004
… Appellant
… Respondent
None for Appellant. Mr Mandar Vaidya for Respondent.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA AND
B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ.
DATE : 07[th] JANUARY, 2016
P.C.:-
1.This matter was called out in the morning. None appeared for the Appellant – Revenue. It was therefore kept back at 3.00 p.m. At 3.00 p.m., the matter was again called out. None appears for the Appellant – Revenue in support of the Appeal. It appears that the Revenue is not interested in pursuing this Appeal. Accordingly, The Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue