Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd

High Court 28 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd
Date of order
28 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.155 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd...Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Arun Siwach i/by Amarchand & Mangaldas & S.A. Shroff & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 28[th] February, 2011. 1.The learned Counsel for the Revenue states that similar questions raised by the Revenue in the subsequent assessment year viz. A.Y. 2008-09 have been accepted by the Revenue. 2.In this view of the matter, since the decision of the Tribunal has been accepted, there is no reason to entertain the present appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan