The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.bombay Cycle & Motor Agency Limited
High Court
25 Mar 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.bombay Cycle & Motor Agency Limited
Date of order
25 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.bombay Cycle & Motor Agency Limited, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: DATE : 25[th] March 2013 P.C. : 1.In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2002-2003, following question of law has been formulated for our consideration. “Whether, on the facts of the case and in law, the Tribunal has erred in deleting the disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs.1,53,73,9...
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1078 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Bombay Cycle & Motor Agency Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Abhay Ahuja for the appellant.Ms.Vasanti Patel for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ.
DATE : 25[th] March 2013
P.C. :
1.In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2002-2003,
following question of law has been formulated for our consideration.
“Whether, on the facts of the case and in law, the Tribunal has erred in deleting the disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs.1,53,73,928/- holding that it is not permitted for the Assessing Officer to make any addition on some other ground which did not form part of the reasons recorded following the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT V/s. Jet Airways (supra) ?”
2.By the impugned order, the Tribunal has allowed the appeal of the respondent – assessee by following the decision of this Court in the
matter of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Jet Airways (I) Limited reported in (2011) 331 ITR 236 (Bom). In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.