In The Commissioner Of Income – Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.gbll Power Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.684 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income – Tax – 5, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.GBLL Power Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Jitendra Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 14[th] December, 2010.
1.Counsel for the parties state that similar questions raised in
Income Tax Appeal Nos.2077 of 2009 and 2088 of 2009 have already been
dismissed by this Court on 12[th] October 2009. For the reasons stated therein,
the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue