In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.sinex International Private Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.15 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Sinex International Private Limited..Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ.
DATE : 24[th] June, 2011.
P.C. :
1.Since the questions raised in this appeal are covered against the
Revenue by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of T.R.F. Limited V/s.
Commissioner of Income Tax reported in (2010) 323 ITR 397 (SC), counsel
for the Revenue seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
2.The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off as such.
Refund of Court Fee as per rules.
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue