Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Jet Airways (India) Ltd

High Court 23 Jul 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Jet Airways (India) Ltd
Date of order
23 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Jet Airways (India) Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Issue: The said question (h) is as under: (h)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the order of the ITAT is justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing officer on account of provision for doubtful debts while computing Book Profit u/s.

Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

ASN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.351 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-5. Vs. M/s. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, Sr. Counsel along with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 23rd July, 2012 PC: It is agreed that except the question sought to be raised in Paragraph 4(h) of the appeal, the other questions sought to be raised are answered against the appellant by the judgment of this Court dated 28[th] September, 2011 in Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai Vs. M/s. Jet Airways (India) Limited. The said question (h) is as under: (h)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the order of the ITAT is justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing officer on account of provision for doubtful debts while computing Book Profit u/s. 115JB?115JB? 2)In view of the retrospective amendment to Section 115JB by Finance Act No.2 of 2009 with effect from 1[st] April 2001, counsel for the parties states that this question may be restored back to the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for fresh consideration. 3)Accordingly, question 4(h) is restored to file of the Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with law. costs. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to ( M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ) ( S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan