The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Sundaram Gems Pvt. Ltd
High Court
30 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Sundaram Gems Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
30 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S. Sundaram Gems Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATED : 30 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer by estimating the additional gross profit at 4.9%, is the question raised in this Appeal.
Decision: Hence, the Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6785 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-5..Appellant.Vs.
M/s. Sundaram Gems Pvt. Ltd.,..Respondent.
....
Mr. N.A. Kazi, for the Appellant.
Dr. K. Shivaram a/w. Rahul K. Hakani, for the Respondent.
....
P.C.
CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR &
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. th NOVEMBER, 2011.
DATED : 30
1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer by estimating the additional gross profit at 4.9%, is the question raised in this Appeal.
2.The finding of fact recorded by the ITAT in para-12 of its judgment is that the Assessing Officer compared profits of the assessee with the comparable cases in the market where the profits of persons engaged in export of diamond was high. The Tribunal has recorded a finding of fact that in the assessment year in question, the gross profit has increased compared to the gross profit in the earlier years. The
Tribunal has recorded finding that the assessee has maintained the carat wise stock register which is the regular practice prevalent in the diamond trade. The Tribunal has recorded a finding of fact that in the present case, the books of account maintained by the assessee could not be rejected without pointing out defects, if any, especially when the books maintained to the same effect in the earlier years have been accepted by the Revenue.
3.In these circumstances, in our opinion, no fault can be found with the decision of the ITAT. Accordingly, we see no reason to entertain the Appeal. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.