Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 v. M/...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 v. M/S.aligad Investment And Finance Pvt. Ltd

High Court 01 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 v. M/S.aligad Investment And Finance Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
01 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 v. M/S.aligad Investment And Finance Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5552 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 5 ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Aligad Investment and Finance Pvt. Ltd...Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Mandar Vaidya i/by Roy's Law firm for the respondent. P.C. : CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ. DATE : 1[st] July, 2011. 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The Tribunal in para 4 of its order has recorded a finding of fact that in the present case the assessee had claimed expenditure on account of of legal / professional charges incurred in connection with the retention of control and management, which were disallowed and in such a case penalty cannot be levied as it was not a case of concealing the particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income so as to attract the penal provisions of Section 271(1)(c). The decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact. No substantial question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan