The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.gabriel India Ltd
High Court
18 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.gabriel India Ltd
Date of order
18 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.gabriel India Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.234 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-5....Appellantvs.M/s.gabriel India Ltd....Respondent.
---
Mr.R. Ashokan, for appellant.Mr.Punjabrao Naik, for Respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 18TH July, 2008.
P.C.:-1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for boththe sides. Perusal of the impugned order shows thatthe tribunal has completely relied on the judgment ofthe Supreme Court in the case “S.A. Builders Ltd. Vs.CIT, 288 ITR page 1”. The learned Counsel appearingfor appellant is not able to point out us that thelaw laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid
judgment is not applicable. No substantial questionof law arises. Hence, the appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)---
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue