Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.shukra Jewellery Ltd

High Court 17 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.shukra Jewellery Ltd
Date of order
17 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S.shukra Jewellery Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3765 OF 2006 in INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1726of 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-5.. Appellant Vs. M/s.Shukra Jewellery Ltd.. Respondent Mr.Asokan for AppellantNone for Respondent CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 17th June, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.None appears for the respondent though served. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakesto file affidavit of service. Perused theaffidavit in support of the notice of motion. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 17 days delay caused in filing theappeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavitin support of the notice of motion, sufficientcause is made out for condonation of delay andthere is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence,the notice of moition is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a). {A.V.Nirgude, J} (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J}
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan