Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. M/S.avhan Technologies Limited, Mumbai

High Court 07 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. M/S.avhan Technologies Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
07 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. M/S.avhan Technologies Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: P.C. : 1.The following two questions of law have been formulated in the Appeal filed by the revenue : a)Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in deleting the addition of Rs.10,65,000/- on account of bad debts made by the A.O. even though the debt has...

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2463 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, MumbaiVersus ..Appellant. M/s.Avhan Technologies Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 7[th] January, 2010. P.C. : 1.The following two questions of law have been formulated in the Appeal filed by the revenue : a)Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in deleting the addition of Rs.10,65,000/- on account of bad debts made by the A.O. even though the debt has not become bad during the relevant A.Y. 2001-02 ? b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the I.T.A.T. is justified in law in deleting the addition of Rs.1,35,494/- which included the amount of Rs.1,32,754/- representing interest on delayed payment which pertained to the A.Y. under appeal ? appearing for the revenue states that the issue is covered against the revenue in the Judgment of this Court in Oman International [313 ITR 128 (Bom.)]. 3.In so far as the second issue is concerned, the Tribunal has confirmed a finding of fact which has been recorded by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in para 4 of the Judgment. 4.Hence, no substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan