Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. M/S.esjay International P Limited

High Court 06 Aug 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. M/S.esjay International P Limited
Date of order
06 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. M/S.esjay International P Limited, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

itxa3499-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3499 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai Versus M/s.Esjay International P Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 6 August 2010. P.C. : 1.The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arises out of the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 3 April 2009 in relation to assessment year 2004-2005. The appeal gives rise to the following substantial question of law : Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was correct in holding that receipts of duty drawback and DEPB is profit or gain derived from an industrial undertaking under Section 80IB, despite the proximate source of the receipts being export import policy of Government of India and not the business of the undertaking ? 2.The appeal is admitted. With the consent of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and the Counsel on behalf of the respondent, the appeal is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 3.The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and the assessee are agreed in stating before the Court that the question of law is covered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee, by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Liberty India V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax[1]. 4.In view of the statement made, the question of law is answered in the negative in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan