Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. Mudra Communication Limited, Mumbai

High Court 21 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. Mudra Communication Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
21 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai v. Mudra Communication Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1297 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Mudra Communication Limited, Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.114 of 2009 decided on9/2/2009 in the case of Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)V/s. M/s.Oman International Bank SAOG (unreported). 2.In the light of that, there is no merit in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan