The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.ajit India (Gujarat) P.ltd
High Court
22 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.ajit India (Gujarat) P.ltd
Date of order
22 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.ajit India (Gujarat) P.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2785 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1332 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-6 .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Ajit India (Gujarat) P.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango for the appellant
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2008
DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2008
P.C.:
1. None appears for the respondent though
served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is
seeking condonation of 83 days’ delay caused in
filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion,
sufficient cause is made out for condonation of
delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence
or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant.
Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in
2
terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission in
the month of October, 2008, subject to numbering.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue