Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.amar Tea Ltd

High Court 27 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

27 Sep 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.amar Tea Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5808 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-6 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Amar Tea Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 27[th] SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. The counsel for the Revenue states that similar questions raised in the Assessee’s own case being Tax Appeal No.806 of 2010 have been rejected on 7.2.2011. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.