The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6 v. M/S.elan Electronics Private Limited
High Court
08 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6 v. M/S.elan Electronics Private Limited
Date of order
08 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6 v. M/S.elan Electronics Private Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed holding it to be without any substance with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3336 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 6,
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Elan Electronics Private Limited
..Respondents.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections, if any are over-ruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. Take up for hearing at the request of learned counsel for the revenue.
2.Having gone through the order of the tribunal, we do not find any substantial question of law arising out of the order of the tribunal. The tribunal has sufficiently protected the interest of the revenue by giving an opportunity to restore the appeal on the rolls of the tribunal by filing Miscellaneous Application.
3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed holding it to be without any substance with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue