The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.e.merck (Indi) Ltd
High Court
08 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.e.merck (Indi) Ltd
Date of order
08 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.e.merck (Indi) Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1474 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1474 OF 200
The Commissioner of Income Tax-6 .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.E.Merck (Indi) Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta i/by M/s.S.P.Mehta for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 8th April, 2008
DATE : 8th April, 2008
DATE : 8th April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Appellant-revenue seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be
withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees
be refunded to the Appellant as per the rules.
2. In view of withdrawal of the Appeal itself, nothing
further survives in the Notice of Motion No.2817/2006.
Hence, the Notice of Motion No.2817/2006 also stands
dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue