Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.icici Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd

High Court 04 Feb 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.icici Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd
Date of order
04 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S.icici Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the above, we see no fault with the order of 4)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

ASN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1670 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-6. ..Appellant. v. M/s.ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar i/by Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.Mr.S.P. Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 4[th] February, 2013. PC: This appeal by the revenue for assessment year 2003-04 arises out of consequential order passed by the Assessing officer consequent to Section 263 order of the Commissioner of Income Tax. 2) The Tribunal in the impugned order has dismissed the revenue's appeal on the ground that the revisional authority's order under section 263 was quashed by the Tribunal by its order dated 22/1/2009.The revenue carried the matter in appeal to this ASN Court. This Court by its order dated 14/12/2009 upheld the order of the Tribunal dated 22/1/2009.Since the revisional authority's order has been set aside, the Tribunal also set aside the consequential order of the Assessing officer. 3)the Tribunal. In view of the above, we see no fault with the order of 4)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan