Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 Appell...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 Appellant Mumbai-20 v. Nalini Properties Pvt.ltd

High Court 10 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 Appellant Mumbai-20 v. Nalini Properties Pvt.ltd
Date of order
10 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 Appellant Mumbai-20 v. Nalini Properties Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

itxa-796/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.796/2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax -7AppellantMumbai-20 Vs.Nalini Properties Pvt.Ltd. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the AppellantMr.K.Gopal a/w Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Respondent CORAM-J.P.DEVADHAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJDATE-10TH JANUARY,2011. P.C. .Learned counsel for the Revenue states that the additions made in the hands of the respondent assessee on protective basis were deleted by the Tribunal because additions made on substantive basis in the hands of Mr.Sudhakar T.Pendse have been upheld . Counsel on both the sides brought to our notice that the appeal filed by Mr.Sudhakar T.Pendse being Tax Appeal No. 186/2009 has been dismissed on 22.4.2009 .Thus the additions in the hands of Sudhakar T.Pendse on substantive basis has attained finality. itxa-796/2009 2.In these circumstances the claim of the Revenue in seeking to sustain the additions in the hands of the respondent-assessee cannot be accepted. 3.Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan