The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.savani Financials Limited
High Court
07 Jan 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.savani Financials Limited
Date of order
07 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.savani Financials Limited, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The Appeal is according disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2458 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai ..Versus
....Appellant...........Respondent.
M/s.Savani Financials Limited
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr.Pankaj R. Toprani for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 7[th] January, 2010.
P.C. :
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Virtual Soft Systems Limited V/s. Commissioner of IncometAx [ 289 ITR 93]while setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Since the judgment of the Supreme Court in Virtual Soft Systems has been over-ruled in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Gold CoinHealth Food Private Limited [ 304 ITR 308], it would be appropriate to remand the proceedings to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on merits. Both the learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee have agreed to this course of action being followed.
2.In these circumstances, the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 17[th ]June 2008 is set aside by consent and the proceedings are remanded back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on merits. The Appeal is according disposed of. No order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.