The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.supriya Real Estate P. Limited
High Court
14 Dec 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.supriya Real Estate P. Limited
Date of order
14 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.supriya Real Estate P. Limited, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2374 OF 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1959 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Supriya Real Estate P. Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 14[th] December, 2010.
1.This Notice of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal and also for restoration of the appeal which was dismissed under Rule 986 of the High Court Original Side Rules. By consent the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). The Notice of Motion is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue