The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.ultramarine & Pigments Limited, Mumbai
High Court
08 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.ultramarine & Pigments Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
08 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. M/S.ultramarine & Pigments Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3338 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, Mumbai..Respondents.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.S.S. Shetty for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the respondent. Office objections, if any are over-ruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. Taken up for hearing by consent of both the parties.
2.The question sought to be raised in this appeal relates to the reopening of the assessment, after expiry of four years. The tribunal has recorded a categorical finding of fact based on appreciation of evidence that there was no failure on the part of the assessee in disclosing fully and truly all material facts for completing the assessment.
3.Under these circumstances, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.