Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. Viraj Impex Private Limited, Mumbai

High Court 11 Mar 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. Viraj Impex Private Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
11 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai v. Viraj Impex Private Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2453 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Viraj Impex Private Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Pankaj R. Toprani for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 11[th] March, 2010. P.C. : 1.The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states on instructions that the valuation which has been arrived at by the Tribunal is acceptable to the Revenue. In this view of the matter, it is not necessary to entertain the appeal which would not raise any substantial question of law. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan