The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.ramniranjan Kedia
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.ramniranjan Kedia
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.ramniranjan Kedia, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.484 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.134 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-7.. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Ramniranjan Kedia
Tourism Services P.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan with Mr.A.D.Kargo for the
appellant
None for the respondent
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008
DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008
P.C.:
1. None appears for the respondent though
served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is
seeking condonation of 92 days’ delay caused in
filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion,
sufficient cause is made out for condonation of
delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence
2
or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant.
Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission in
the month of August, 2008, subject to numbering.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.