The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.royal Western India Turf Club Ltd
High Court
05 Apr 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.royal Western India Turf Club Ltd
Date of order
05 Apr 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.royal Western India Turf Club Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the event of costs being paid, time for removal of office objections shall stand extended by a further period of four weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3985 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.193 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-7. Vs.
...Appellant.
M/s.Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd.
...Respondent.
....
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
April 5, 2010.
P.C. :
Though the Respondent has been served, none appears on behalf of the Respondent.
The Motion has been taken out for restoration of an
appeal which stands dismissed for non-compliance with the conditional order dated 17[th] June 2009 for non-removal of office
objections. We have perused the affidavit in support and are of the
view that while interests of justice will require that the appeal should be restored to file, this should be subject to payment of
costs to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority, which shall be a condition precedent. The Notice of Motion is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of costs quantified at Rs.1500/- which shall be paid within a period of two weeks from today. We have directed that the payment of costs should be made to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority since no one appears for the Respondent. In the event of costs being paid, time for removal of office objections shall stand extended by a further period of four weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without reference to the Court. The motion is accordingly disposed of.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.