Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.tracstar Investment Ltd

High Court 07 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.tracstar Investment Ltd
Date of order
07 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S.tracstar Investment Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

T IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 350 OF 2011 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4958 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income tax-7 Vs. M/s.Tracstar Investment Ltd ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Ms.Suchitra Kamble, for the Appellant. Mr.Mandar Vaidya i/b Ray's Law Firm for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.DATE : 7TH JULY, 2011. P.C. 1.Heard. 2.This notice of motion is taken out seeking condonation of delay of 470 days in filing the notice of motion for restoration of the appeal. The notice of motion is opposed by the counsel for the revenue. Perusal of the affidavit in support of the notice of motion does not disclose sufficient cause for restoration of the appeal. However, in the interest of justice, it would be just and proper to condone the delay subject to payment of cost of Rs. 5000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent within a period of two weeks from today. 3. Subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent within two weeks from today, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan