The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. Dated : 22Nd August, 2014

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.614 OF 2012 M/s. Vinati Wax Industries Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax-8, Mumbai..Respondent.Mr. Pankaj Toprani i/v. Kadambari V. Surve for the appellant. Mr.Arvind Pinto with A.K.Saxena for the respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND A.K. MENON, JJ. DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2014 P.C. :- 1.Mr.Toprani, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-assessee states that he has instructions to seek leave to withdraw this appeal. 2.Mr.Pinto, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent does not object to the grant of such leave but submits that an order was passed on 1[st] August, 2014 at the request of the appellant-assessee to enable him to produce an affidavit of his Advocate / representative before the Tribunal in support of his stand that some documents which were produced before the Tribunal were not considered. 3.We need not to enter into this controversy but suffice it to note that since the appellant-assessee does not wish to proceed with the appeal, it means that this stand is also given up. Leave to withdraw the appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (A.K. MENON, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)