The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. Marwah Steels Private Limited, Mumbai
High Court
18 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. Marwah Steels Private Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
18 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. Marwah Steels Private Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1798 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Marwah Steels Private Limited, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Ms.Meghana Butala i/by Mr.S.C. Tiwari for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard. The impugned order is a composite order for four years. The appeal preferred against the impugned order relating to other three assessment years being Income Tax Appeal Nos.1501 of 2009, 1503 of 2009 and 1523 of 2009 between same parties were already dismissed by this Court vide order dated 29-8-2009.
2.For the reasons recorded therein, this appeal is also liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law. A copy of order is retained on record. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue