The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -8, Mumbai v. M/S Godfrey Philips India Ltd Mumbai
High Court
10 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -8, Mumbai v. M/S Godfrey Philips India Ltd Mumbai
Date of order
10 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -8, Mumbai v. M/S Godfrey Philips India Ltd Mumbai, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 242 of 2011.
The Commissioner of Income-tax -8, Mumbai
... Appellant.
Versus
M/s Godfrey Philips India Ltd Mumbai
... Respondent.
Mr N.A. Kazi, for the appellant.Mr S.M. Shah i/by Chitnis & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 10 January,2012.
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that the questions raised in this appeal are
covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT vs.
Shah Rukh Khan in Income Tax Appeal No. 1206 of 2010 decided on 29[th ]August, 2011. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue