In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai v. M/S.atos Origin (India) P. Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3733 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Atos Origin (India) P. Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.S.P. Mehta for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 29[th] July, 2011.
1.Counsel for the parties state that the question of law raised by
the Revenue in appeal is answered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Gem Plus Jewellery
India Limited reported in (2011) 330 ITR 175 (Bom.).
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue