In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. M/S.omarson Apparels Private Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.53 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Omarson Apparels Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Dr.K. Shivram with Mr.Ajay R. Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 6[th] December, 2010.
1.The learned counsel for the Revenue fairly states that similar
questions raised in the assessee’s own case being Income Tax Appeal No.1677
of 2008 (C.I.T. V/s. M/s.Omarson Apparels Pvt.Ltd.) has been dismissed by this Court on 22[nd] July 2009.
2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue