Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. M/S.pomona Exports Private Limited

High Court 28 Sep 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. M/S.pomona Exports Private Limited
Date of order
28 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. M/S.pomona Exports Private Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.The questions raised in the present appeal are, therefore, misconceived and the appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6048 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Pomona Exports Private Limited..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Pankaj R. Toprani with Ms.Kadambari Surve for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 28[th] September 2011 1.This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5[th] March 2010 passed in ITA No.6302/Mum/2008 relating to assessment year 2005-06. The impugned order is passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal pursuant to the order dated 29[th] September 2009, whereby the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee was allowed and the original order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was recalled. 2.The question raised in this appeal relates to the order of the Tribunal allowing the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee. Once the Miscellaneous Application is allowed and fresh order is passed by the Tribunal while challenging the fresh order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, it is not open to the Revenue to challenge the validity of the order passed by the Tribunal in allowing the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee. 3.The questions raised in the present appeal are, therefore, misconceived and the appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (K.K. Tated, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan