In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. M/S.powertel India Private Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, both the appeals are dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.858 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.859 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 8, MumbaiVersusM/s.Powertel India Private Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.P.S. Jetly i/by Warerkar & Warerkar for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 6TH AUGUST 2009
P.C. :
1.Counsel on both sides agree that the questions sought to be raised in these appeals are squarely covered by the order of this Court passed in Income Tax Appeal No.650 of 2009 (CIT V/s. M/s.Powertel India Private Limited) decided on 6-8-2009.
2.In this view of the matter, both the appeals are dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue