In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai v. Shri Sudhir S. Majithia, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3529 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.304 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 8, Mumbai..Appellant.
VersusShri Sudhir S. Majithia
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Subhash S. Shetty for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 17[th] January 2012
1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue