In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. Daya Singh Arora, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1422 OF 2008
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.60 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8.V.
Daya Singh Arora.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 20[th] November, 2012
PC:
Counsel for the respondent states that a copy of the chamber summons has been served upon the legal heirs of the respondent. He undertakes to file affidavit of service within two weeks from today. Since none appears on behalf of the respondent's legal representatives, Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within one week from today.
2)Re-verification is dispensed with.
(M.S.SANKELCHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue