The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Atos Origin (India) P. Ltd
High Court
08 Feb 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Atos Origin (India) P. Ltd
Date of order
08 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Atos Origin (India) P. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1446 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8.
v.
M/s. Atos Origin (India) P. Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr. R. Murlidhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 08TH FEBRUARY, 2013.
PC:
In this appeal for assessment year 2003-04 the
revenue has raised the following question of law for our consideration.
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case and in law the Tribunal is justified in holding that the expenses reduced from the figure of export turnover should also be excluded from the figure of total turnover while computing deduction under section 10A and 10B of the Income Tax Act,1961 even though there is no such provision in Section 10A and Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
ASN
3)Counsel for the parties state that the issue arising in the present case is covered in favour of the respondent assessee and against the revenue by the decision of this court in the matter of CIT v. Gem Plus Jewelery India Ltd. reported in (2011) 330 ITR 175 (Bom.) In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
4)to costs.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.