In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8 v. M/S Birla Sunlife Insurance Co. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3In view of that, the present appeals also stand dismissed for the reasons recorded in the order dated 21st April, 2017 in Income Tax Appeal No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Dusane
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1205 OF 2014
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1206 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-8,....AppellantMumbai.
Vs.
M/s Birla Sunlife Insurance Co. Ltd.....RespondentMumbai.
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.Mr. Madhur Agarwal a/w Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 7 JUNE, 2017
PER COURT :
The present appeals are in respect of Assessment Years 2006-2007 and 2007-2008.
2Mr. Pinto, the learned counsel for the Appellant fairly concedes that this Court has considered the issue in respect of
Dusane
Assessment Year 2005-2006 in respect of the same Assessee in Income-Tax Appeal No.1208 of 2014 and dismissed the appeal.
3In view of that, the present appeals also stand dismissed for the reasons recorded in the order dated 21st April, 2017 in Income Tax Appeal No. 1208 of 2014. No costs.
( G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue