The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S Boutique Fashions Pvt Ltd
High Court
28 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S Boutique Fashions Pvt Ltd
Date of order
28 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S Boutique Fashions Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1962 OF 2008IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1467 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8
Versus
M/s Boutique Fashions Pvt Ltd
).. Appellant
).. Respondent
Mr Suresh Kumar i/b Mr S M Shah for the Appellant.Mr A K Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE:28TH JULY 2008.
P.C.
There is a delay of 488 days in filing the present Appeal. Noproper reason has been given in the affidavit in support of the Motion.The dates stated in paragraph 4 of the affidavit do not adequatelyexplain why the delay occurred and in fact there is no explanation whatsteps were taken from 4[th] August 2008 to 14[th] May 2008 causing adelay of more than one and half years. Keeping in view the judgment ofthe Division Bench of this Court in The State of Maharashtra vs Vithu
Kalya Govari and others, Civil Application No.3200 of 2007 dated 26[th]June 2007, we see no reason to condone the delay. Notice of Motion isaccordingly dismissed.
3.
As a result of the dismissal of Notice of Motion for
condonation of delay, the present Appeal (Lodging) No. 1467 of 2008does not survive. We may also notice that the revenue involved as aresult of the impugned order is Rs.1,65,236/- which in terms of theCBDT Instruction No.2/2005 dated 24[th] October 2005, the Departmentcan hardly justify the filing of the present Appeal.
4.Appeal (Lodging) No. 1467 of 2008 dismissed. No order asto costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A P DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.