Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. M/...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. M/S. Hurix Systems Pvt. Ltd.…

High Court 01 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. M/S. Hurix Systems Pvt. Ltd.…
Date of order
01 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. M/S. Hurix Systems Pvt. Ltd.…, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: There is no merit in the Appeal and the same is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

pmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.402 OF 2015 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 8 … Appellant Vs. M/s. Hurix Systems Pvt. Ltd.… Respondent Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.Mr. Deepak Tralshawala a/w Mr. Vishnu S. Hadade for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ. 1[st ] NOVEMBER, 2017 DATE : P.C. 1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The challenge in this Appeal by the Appellant – Revenue is to the finding recorded by the Appellate Tribunal in paragraph 9 of the impugned judgment. The challenge is on the basis of substantial questions of law framed in paragraph 6.1 to 6.3. 2Now, the issue is no longer res integra in view of what is held by the Apex Court in paragraph 18 of the judgment dated 16th December, 2016 in Civil Appeal No.8498 of 2013 (C.I.T. & Anr. Vs. M/s. Yokogawa India Ltd). 3Hence, no substantial question of law arises. There is no merit in the Appeal and the same is dismissed. (A.K. MENON, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan