The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. M/S. Hurix Systems Pvt. Ltd.…
High Court
01 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. M/S. Hurix Systems Pvt. Ltd.…
Date of order
01 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 8 v. M/S. Hurix Systems Pvt. Ltd.…, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: There is no merit in the Appeal and the same is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.402 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 8
… Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Hurix Systems Pvt. Ltd.… Respondent
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.Mr. Deepak Tralshawala a/w Mr. Vishnu S. Hadade for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
1[st ] NOVEMBER, 2017
DATE :
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The challenge in this Appeal by the Appellant – Revenue is to the finding recorded by the Appellate Tribunal in paragraph 9 of the impugned judgment. The challenge is on the basis of substantial questions of law framed in paragraph 6.1 to 6.3.
2Now, the issue is no longer res integra in view of what is held by the Apex Court in paragraph 18 of the judgment dated 16th
December, 2016 in Civil Appeal No.8498 of 2013 (C.I.T. & Anr. Vs. M/s. Yokogawa India Ltd).
3Hence, no substantial question of law arises. There is no merit in the Appeal and the same is dismissed.
(A.K. MENON, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.