Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. M/S. Lexi Pens (India) Pvt. Ltd

High Court 08 Oct 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. M/S. Lexi Pens (India) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
08 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. M/S. Lexi Pens (India) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

SRK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.775 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income tax -8V/SM/s. Lexi Pens (India) Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellant.. Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the revenue.Mr. M. Subramaniam i/by Mr. Vishnu S. Hadade for the respondent. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.AND A.K. MENON, J. P.C. DATED : 8[th] October, 2014 The present appeal challenges the order passed by the Tribunal, Mumbai Bench on 18th November, 2011. 2.The assessment year is 2006-07. The Commissioner of Income tax allowed the assessee’s appeal by order dated 1st December, 2009. In allowing the appeal of the assessee, the Commissioner followed the order passed by the Tribunal’s Co-ordinate Bench in assessee’s own case for assessment year 2005-06 in Income tax Appeal No.4883/Mum/2008 decided on 29th October, 2008. The deduction under the same statutory provision viz. Section 80IB of the Income tax Act, 1961 was claimed. The consistent view taken by the Tribunal and in the assessee’s case on facts, thus, cannot be said to be perverse. SRK pointed out to it for the assessment year in question. The earlier order passed by the Tribunal’s co-ordinate Bench has not been challenged by the revenue. 4.In such circumstances, this appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. (A.K. Menon, J.) (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan