The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Pfizer Ltd
High Court
09 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Pfizer Ltd
Date of order
09 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Pfizer Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4120 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2054 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8.
...Appellant.
Vs.M/s. Pfizer Ltd.
...Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 09th January, 2009.
PC :1. This is a notice of motion for condonation of 561days delay in filing the main appeal. On perusing theaffidavit in support of the motion, we find that thefinal approval for filing the appeal was given on6.12.2006. The appeal was however filed on 9.7.2008.The delay between the period from 6.12.2006 to 9.7.2008is not properly explained in the affidavit. In ourview, the cause shown does not amount to sufficientcause. In the circumstances, Notice of motion is
dismissed. Consequently appeal dismissed. Refund of
court fee as per rules.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue