The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Sulzer India Limited
High Court
05 Dec 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Sulzer India Limited
Date of order
05 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Sulzer India Limited, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 453 OF 2013
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 762 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8,versusM/s. Sulzer India Limited,
}Appellant}Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta-Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Revenue.
Mr. Soli Dastur-Senior Advocate with Mr. Niraj Seth i/b. Mr. A. K. Jasani for the Assessee.
CORAM :-S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &A.K.MENON, JJ.
DATE :- December 5, 2014
P. C.
Heard both sides. For the reasons set out in the affidavit in
support and finding that the cause shown is reasonable and bonafide, the delay of 700 days in filing the Appeal is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (A).
2)The Appeal be registered and shall be taken to have been disposed of together with other connected Appeals.
(A.K.MENON, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue