Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.apjesh Impex P. Ltd

High Court 30 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.apjesh Impex P. Ltd
Date of order
30 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.apjesh Impex P. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: In the light of that, the impugned order dated 17-6-2004 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for considering denovo.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

agk 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1048 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax-8 .. Appellant. Versus M/s.Apjesh Impex P. Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr.S.M. Shah with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.K.B. Bhujale for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. : 1. The revenue has preferred this appeal by formulating questions as set out in para 4 of the appeal memo. The A.O. had held the interest to be income from other sources. The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal has held the income as income from business. We, however, find that neither the Commissioner (Appeals) nor the Tribunal has recorded any finding reversing specific finding recorded by the A.O. The only basis on which the Tribunal has proceeded is on account of the assessment in previous years. On behalf of the Respondent-assessee, learned counsel points that even if it is treated as income from other sources, the tax incidence will be less than Rs.4 lakhs and as such the appeal as filed, considering the CBDT agk 2 circular, would not be maintainable. 2. After hearing counsel, in our opinion, ends of justice will be met if the order of the Tribunal is set aside and issue referred back to the Tribunal for considering the matter denovo, most specifically considering the material now placed before us by the learned counsel for the appellant setting out that the company is also carrying out financial business. 3. In the light of that, the impugned order dated 17-6-2004 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for considering denovo. The appeal accordingly disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan