The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.apjesh Impex P. Ltd
High Court
30 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.apjesh Impex P. Ltd
Date of order
30 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.apjesh Impex P. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: In the light of that, the impugned order dated 17-6-2004 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for considering denovo.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
agk 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1048 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8 .. Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Apjesh Impex P. Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.S.M. Shah with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Mr.K.B. Bhujale for the respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 30TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :
1. The revenue has preferred this appeal by
formulating questions as set out in para 4 of the
appeal memo. The A.O. had held the interest to be
income from other sources. The Commissioner
(Appeals) and the Tribunal has held the income as
income from business. We, however, find that
neither the Commissioner (Appeals) nor the Tribunal
has recorded any finding reversing specific finding
recorded by the A.O. The only basis on which the
Tribunal has proceeded is on account of the
assessment in previous years. On behalf of the
Respondent-assessee, learned counsel points that
even if it is treated as income from other sources,
the tax incidence will be less than Rs.4 lakhs and
as such the appeal as filed, considering the CBDT
agk 2
circular, would not be maintainable.
2. After hearing counsel, in our opinion, ends
of justice will be met if the order of the Tribunal
is set aside and issue referred back to the Tribunal
for considering the matter denovo, most specifically
considering the material now placed before us by the
learned counsel for the appellant setting out that
the company is also carrying out financial business.
3. In the light of that, the impugned order
dated 17-6-2004 is set aside and the matter is
remanded back to the Tribunal for considering
denovo. The appeal accordingly disposed of.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.