The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8 v. M/S.filtrona India Ltd
High Court
19 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8 v. M/S.filtrona India Ltd
Date of order
19 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8 v. M/S.filtrona India Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1103 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-8
..Appellant
vs.
M/s.Filtrona India Ltd... Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/by Suresh Kumar for AppellantNone for Respondent
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED :19[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C.:
1.Heard learned Counsel for the Revenue. Office objections stand overruled. Registry is directed to register the Appeal.
2.Question sought to be raised in this Appeal is with regard to imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal, after considering the factual aspect, recorded that even if certain disallowance is sustained, penalty cannot be levied automatically, Imposition is based on appreciation of evidence and the finding of fact is recorded in favour of the Appellant, with which no fault can be found.
3.Under these circumstances, no substantial question of law is involved. The Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.law is involved. The Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
[V.C. DAGA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.