Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 8 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 8 v. M/S.garware Polester Ltd

High Court 05 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 8 v. M/S.garware Polester Ltd
Date of order
05 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 8 v. M/S.garware Polester Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering the above, the questions of law as framed, does not arise and the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income-Tax 8 )..Appellant Versus M/s.Garware Polester Ltd., )..Respondents ---- Mr.S.M.Shah with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.S.B.Shetty for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 5.12.2007. PC 1. In so far as questions-(a) & (b) of the appeal is concerned, the Tribunal relied upon its earlier order in respect of the assessment year 1989-90 till 1995-96, the department has not preferred any appeal against the said orders. 2. In so far as question-(c) is concerned, the Tribunal also relied on its order in respect of assessement year 1989-90. That was the subject matter of Appeal (L) No.50 of 2002. As there was office objections, the Prothonotary & Senior Master, by order dated 5.3.2002 has directed to remove the objections within 2 weeks failing which, it would stand rejected under R-986. There was a Notice of : 2 : Motion taken out and the matter came up before this Court. This Court by order dated 2.1.2004 granted 8 weeks time to the revenue to remove the office objections, that has not been done and consequently, that appeal has been dismissed. 3. Considering the above, the questions of law as framed, does not arise and the appeal stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan