The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 8 v. M/S.garware Polester Ltd
High Court
05 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 8 v. M/S.garware Polester Ltd
Date of order
05 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 8 v. M/S.garware Polester Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Considering the above, the questions of law as framed, does not arise and the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-Tax 8 )..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Garware Polester Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.S.M.Shah with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.S.B.Shetty for respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 5.12.2007.
PC
1. In so far as questions-(a) & (b) of the appeal
is concerned, the Tribunal relied upon its earlier
order in respect of the assessment year 1989-90 till
1995-96, the department has not preferred any appeal
against the said orders.
2. In so far as question-(c) is concerned, the
Tribunal also relied on its order in respect of
assessement year 1989-90. That was the subject
matter of Appeal (L) No.50 of 2002. As there was
office objections, the Prothonotary & Senior Master,
by order dated 5.3.2002 has directed to remove the
objections within 2 weeks failing which, it would
stand rejected under R-986. There was a Notice of
: 2 :
Motion taken out and the matter came up before this
Court. This Court by order dated 2.1.2004 granted 8
weeks time to the revenue to remove the office
objections, that has not been done and consequently,
that appeal has been dismissed.
3. Considering the above, the questions of law as
framed, does not arise and the appeal stands
dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.